open access publication

Article, 2024

The gray zone: How not imposing a strict lockdown at the beginning of a pandemic can cost many lives

Labour Economics, ISSN 0927-5371, 10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102580

Contributors

Crudu F. 0000-0003-3969-5914 [1] Di Stefano R. 0000-0002-2352-3571 [2] Mellace G. 0000-0003-1784-6654 (Corresponding author) [3] Tiezzi S. [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Siena
  2. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] Dipartimento di Fisica
  4. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD];
  5. [3] University of Southern Denmark
  6. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

The public debate on the effectiveness of lockdown measures is far from being settled. We estimate the impact of not having implemented a strict lockdown in the Bergamo province, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, despite observing an infection rate in this area similar to the one observed in nearby municipalities where a strict lockdown was instead promptly implemented. We estimate the causal effect of this policy decision on daily excess mortality using the synthetic control method (SCM). We find that about two-thirds of the reported deaths could have been avoided had the Italian government declared a Red Zone in the Bergamo province. We also clarify that, in this context, SCM and difference-in-differences implicitly restrict effect heterogeneity. We provide a way to empirically assess the credibility of this assumption in our setting.

Keywords

Bergamo, COVID-19, Causal impact, Non-pharmaceutical interventions, Red zone, Synthetic control method

Funders

  • Università degli Studi di Siena
  • University of London
  • Department of Economics, University of Bergamo

Data Provider: Elsevier