open access publication

Article, 2024

Influence of the processing on composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties of mealworm protein concentrates produced by isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration/diafiltration

Food Chemistry, ISSN 0308-8146, Volume 449, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.139177

Contributors

Pinel G. [1] [2] Berthelot U. [1] Queiroz L.S. 0000-0002-1436-5153 [2] Santiago L.D.A. [2] [3] Nogueira Silva N.F. [2] [4] Petersen H.O. [2] Sloth J.J. 0000-0002-3636-8769 [2] Altay I. 0000-0003-4447-7479 [2] Marie R. 0000-0002-8338-1990 [2] Feyissa A.H. 0000-0003-4278-2023 [2] Casanova F. 0000-0001-7418-3223 (Corresponding author) [2] Doyen A. 0000-0001-9293-8036 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Laval University
  2. [NORA names: Canada; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] Technical University of Denmark
  4. [NORA names: DTU Technical University of Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
  6. [NORA names: Brazil; America, South];
  7. [4] Federal University of São Carlos
  8. [NORA names: Brazil; America, South]

Abstract

Edible insects represent a great alternative protein source but food neophobia remains the main barrier to consumption. However, the incorporation of insects as protein-rich ingredients, such as protein concentrates, could increase acceptance. In this study, two methods, isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration-diafiltration, were applied to produce mealworm protein concentrates, which were compared in terms of composition, protein structure and techno-functional properties. The results showed that the protein content of the isoelectric precipitation concentrate was higher than ultrafiltration-diafiltration (80 versus 72%) but ash (1.91 versus 3.82%) and soluble sugar (1.43 versus 8.22%) contents were lower. Moreover, the protein structure was affected by the processing method, where the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited a higher surface hydrophobicity (493.5 versus 106.78 a.u) and a lower denaturation temperature (161.32 versus 181.44 °C). Finally, the ultrafiltration-diafiltration concentrate exhibited higher solubility (87 versus 41%) and emulsifying properties at pH 7 compared to the concentrate obtained by isoelectric precipitation.

Keywords

Isoelectric precipitation, Protein concentrate, Techno-functional properties, Tenebrio molitor, Ultrafiltration-diafiltration

Funders

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK Government
  • Groupe Neoxis Inc.

Data Provider: Elsevier