Article, 2024

Defining malnutrition in persons with spinal cord injury – does the Global Criteria for Malnutrition work?

Food and Nutrition Research, ISSN 1654-6628, Volume 68, 10.29219/fnr.v68.9989

Contributors

Slettahjell H.B. (Corresponding author) [1] Bastakis M. [1] Biering-Sorensen F. 0000-0002-2186-0144 [2] Strom V. Henriksen C. 0000-0002-8079-8467 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Oslo
  2. [NORA names: Norway; Europe, Non-EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Copenhagen
  4. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Background and aims: Physiologic and metabolic changes following spinal cord injury (SCI) lead to an increased risk of malnutrition. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a three-step approach to diag-nose malnutrition: 1) screening; 2) phenotypic and etiological criteria; and 3) malnutrition severity. The main aim of this study was to assess malnutrition in patients with SCI, according to the GLIM criteria. Methods: Patients with SCI (≥ 18 years) admitted to rehabilitation were included. Anthropometrics, food intake, and inflammation were assessed on admission. Fat-free mass index (FFMI) was estimated from bio-impedance analysis. Malnutrition was diagnosed by the GLIM criteria, using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) as the first step screening tool. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed. Results: In total, 66 patients were assessed (50 men) with a mean age of 51.4 (± 17.4) years and median time since injury was 37.5 (10–450) days. The mean body mass index was 24.7 (± 4.2) kg/m, and 1-month involun-tary weight loss was 5.7 (± 4.4)%. FFMI for men was 17.3 (± 1.9) and for women 15.3 (± 1.6) kg/m. Forty-one patients (62%) were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria: 27 moderately and 14 severely malnour-ished. MUST was not able to detect malnutrition risk of nine patients, giving a moderate agreement (kappa 0.66), with a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.92 compared to the GLIM diagnosis. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study, 62% of subacute SCI patients were malnourished according to the GLIM criteria. The screening tool MUST showed moderate agreement with the GLIM criteria and did not detect risk of all patients with a malnutrition diagnosis. The clinical implications of these findings need further investigation.

Keywords

fat-free mass, malnutrition, rehabilitation, spinal cord

Data Provider: Elsevier