open access publication

Article, 2024

Health-related quality of life, needs, and concerns among cancer survivors referred to rehabilitation in primary healthcare setting

Acta Oncologica, ISSN 0284-186X, 1651-226X, Volume 63, 1, Pages 76-82, 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.19636

Contributors

Sandager M. 0000-0001-9609-6577 [1] Rossen S. 0000-0003-0006-7216 (Corresponding author) [1] Hofland D.T. [1] Nielsen C.V. 0000-0002-2467-1103 [2] [3] Maribo T. 0000-0003-0856-6837 [2] [3]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Copenhagen Centre for Cancer and Health
  2. [NORA names: Other Hospitals; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Central Denmark Region
  6. [NORA names: Central Denmark Region; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Background and purpose: There is a growing need for rehabilitation services beyond hospitals. This study aims to describe challenges faced by cancer survivors (CSs) referred for rehabilitation in primary healthcare, employing standardized scales measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and open-ended questions. Furthermore, the study explores the applicability of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in comprehensively understanding challenges encountered by CSs. Material and methods: This cross-sectional study involves CSs referred for cancer rehabilitation in a primary healthcare setting, including those participating in PROs as a part of routine practice. HRQOL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framed the analysis of responses to open-ended questions ‘what concerns you the most?’ and ‘what matters to you?’ Results: FACT-G showed the lowest scores for functional well-being (14.4) and emotional well-being (16.6), with higher scores for physical well-being (18.9) and social/family well-being (21.1). Responses to openended questions unveiled worries about everyday life and how cancer will impact family well-being presently and in the future. Furthermore, CSs reported a need to maintain normality and proactively address the challenges posed by the disease. Interpretation: CSs referred for rehabilitation in primary healthcare experience comprehensive challenges necessitating a holistic rehabilitation approach. This includes interventions supporting CSs in dealing with uncertainty, regaining a sense of control, and addressing family well-being concerns. When using PROs for need assessment, the combination of validated HRQOL scales and open-ended questions is crucial for an in-depth understanding of CSs’ challenges.

Keywords

Cancer rehabilitation, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, functional assessment of cancer therapy-general, health-related quality of life, holistic rehabilitation, patient-reported outcomes

Data Provider: Elsevier