Article,
Insulin Degludec in People with Type 2 Diabetes in China: A Non-interventional, Retrospective Chart Review Study (CN-TREAT)
Contributors
Nordentoft M.
0000-0001-9211-2621
[3]
Zhu D.
0000-0002-1064-1261
(Corresponding author)
[1]
Affiliations
- [1] Nanjing University School of Medicine [NORA names: China; Asia, East];
- [2] Shihezi University [NORA names: China; Asia, East];
- [3] Novo Nordisk A/S [NORA names: Novo Nordisk; Private Research; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
- [4] Department of Thoracic Surgery [NORA names: China; Asia, East];
- [5] Department of Infection Management [NORA names: China; Asia, East];
(... more)
Abstract
Introduction: Insulin degludec (degludec), an ultra-long-acting basal insulin analogue, provides equivalent glycemic control to other basal insulin analogues, with lower risk of hypoglycemia and flexible dosing. Chinese TREsiba AudiT (CN-TREAT) investigated outcomes with degludec in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in routine clinical practice in China. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review study in adults with T2D initiating or switching to degludec at 50 sites in China between January 2020 and July 2021. The primary endpoint was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to end of study (EOS; week 20). Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to EOS in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG), daily insulin dose, and rate of hypoglycemia. Results: Data from 936 participants were included (499 insulin-naïve; 437 insulin-experienced). Mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) HbA1c change from baseline to EOS was − 1.48%-points (− 1.57; − 1.38; P < 0.0001) overall: − 1.95%-points (− 2.08; − 1.81; P < 0.0001) in insulin-naïve participants and − 0.95%-points (− 1.08; − 0.82; P < 0.0001) in insulin-experienced participants. Mean (95% CI) changes in FPG and SMPG were − 2.27 mmol/L (− 2.69; − 1.85; P < 0.0001) and − 2.89 mmol/L (− 3.52; − 2.25; P < 0.0001), respectively, with similar reductions in insulin-naïve and insulin-experienced subgroups. Rate of hypoglycemia did not change statistically significantly from baseline to EOS overall, or in insulin-experienced participants, except when adjusted for baseline hypoglycemia. Basal insulin dose did not change statistically significantly in insulin-experienced participants. Conclusion: In routine clinical practice in China, initiation or switching to degludec was associated with improvements in glycemic control in people with T2D, with no increased risk of hypoglycemia. Trial Registration: ClinialTrials.gov, NCT04227431.
