Article, 2024

Measures of cognitive ability and choice inconsistency

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, ISSN 0167-2681, Volume 220, Pages 495-506, 10.1016/j.jebo.2024.02.029

Contributors

Willadsen H. 0000-0002-2925-7171 [1] Zaccagni S. 0000-0002-9360-1854 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Piovesan M. 0000-0002-5721-3053 [3] Wengstrom E. 0000-0002-1414-9055 [4]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Copenhagen
  2. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] University of Verona
  6. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD];
  7. [4] Department of Economics
  8. [NORA names: Finland; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Cognitive skills affect individual choices. Researchers commonly use Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) tests and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) to assess the relationship between cognitive abilities and economic decision making. In this paper, we study the relationship between these measures, and investigate the extent to which they are correlated and whether they are best described as substitutes or complements. Combining a sample of 686 children and a sample of 2,332 adults, we compare individual performances in the RPM test and CRT test. First, we report a significant positive correlation between the two measures of 0.3. Second, we document that performance in both the RPM test and CRT are significant predictors of behavioral inconsistency observed in incentivized time and risk preference elicitation tasks for children and risk preference elicitation task for adults.

Keywords

Cognitive Reflection, Cognitive Skills, Inconsistent Behavior, Intelligence, Raven Progressive Matrices, Risk Preference, Time Preference

Funders

  • Danmarks Grundforskningsfond
  • Carlsbergfondet

Data Provider: Elsevier