open access publication

Article, 2024

Cardiovascular Outcomes with Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Diabetes: A Real-World Data Analysis

Diabetes Therapy, ISSN 1869-6953, Volume 15, 4, Pages 833-842, 10.1007/s13300-024-01544-3

Contributors

Lai J.Y.M. [1] [2] Riley D.R. 0000-0002-0905-6524 [1] [2] Anson M. 0000-0001-9991-7369 [1] [2] Henney A. [1] [2] Cuthbertson D.J. [1] [2] Hernadez G. [3] Austin P. 0000-0002-8855-220X [3] Lip G.Y.H. 0000-0002-7566-1626 [2] [4] Zhao S.S. 0000-0002-3558-7353 [5] Jackson T.L. 0000-0001-7618-1555 [6] Nabrdalik K. 0000-0002-0777-8048 [2] [7] Alam U. 0000-0002-3190-1122 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] [8]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University Hospital Aintree
  2. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Liverpool
  4. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];
  5. [3] TriNetX LLC.
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] Aalborg University
  8. [NORA names: AAU Aalborg University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] University of Manchester
  10. [NORA names: United Kingdom; Europe, Non-EU; OECD];

Abstract

Background: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is commonly used intravitreally for diabetic proliferative retinopathy, but when used systemically for treating cancers, an excess of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events has been noted. The latter is of concern for people with diabetes, who are at higher risk of CVD. This study aims to explore the relationship between incident CVD and intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with diabetes, compared to other therapies, using a large real-world global federated dataset. Methods: Data were analysed using TriNetX, a global electronic medical real-world ecosystem. The study included adults with diabetes and excluded those with a history of CVD prior to the time window of data extraction. Patients were categorised into two cohorts: anti-VEGF therapy or control cohort (laser or steroid therapies). The cohorts were 1:1 propensity score-matched for age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, and cardiovascular medications. Outcomes analysed at 1, 6 and 12 months were: (1) mortality; (2) acute myocardial infarction (MI); (3) cerebral infarction; and (4) heart failure. Relative risk analyses were performed using the built-in R statistical computing platform on TriNetX. Results: In patients with diabetes (n = 2205; mean age 58.8 ± 15.8, Std diff 0.05; 56% male), anti-VEGF therapy was associated with a numerical but non-statistically significant increased CVD risk over 1, 6, and 12 months: Mortality over 1 month (RR 1; 95% CI 0.42, 2.40), 6 months (RR 1.46; 95% CI 0.72, 2.95) and 12 months (RR 1.41; 95% CI 0.88, 2.27). There was no excess of acute MI over 1 (RR n/a: not applicable; 0/0: 0 events in the anti-VEGF group/0 events in the control group), 6 and 12 months (RR n/a; 0/10 events); cerebral infarction over 1, 6 months (RR n/a; 0/0 events), and 12 months (RR n/a; 0/10); and heart failure over 1 month (RR n/a; 0/0 events), 6 months (RR 1; 95% CI 0.42, 2.40) and 12 months (RR 1; 95% CI 0.42, 2.34). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant risk of cardiovascular-related events in the short or medium term in patients with diabetes who received intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy, despite a small increase in the number of CVD events. Our study supports the real-world safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in patients with diabetes free of baseline CVD.

Keywords

Acute myocardial infarction, Aflibercept, Anti-VEGF, Bevacizumab, Brolucizumab, Cerebral infarction, Faricimab, Heart failure, Stroke, TriNetX

Funders

  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Dutch Ophthalmic Research Centre
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Alcon

Data Provider: Elsevier