open access publication

Article, 2024

Diabetic retinopathy as an independent marker of cardiovascular disease in type 1 diabetes: Results from a nationwide longitudinal matched case–cohort study

Acta Ophthalmologica, ISSN 1755-375X, 1755-3768, 10.1111/aos.16653

Contributors

Mabala D.S. [1] [2] Stokholm L. 0000-0002-9727-6649 [1] Andersen N. 0000-0002-1133-7456 [3] Andresen J. 0000-0002-3936-3429 [3] Bek T. 0000-0002-0409-2534 [4] Heegaard S. 0000-0001-5906-7670 [5] Hajari J.N. 0000-0001-5336-8253 [5] Hojlund K. 0000-0002-0891-4224 [1] [2] Kawasaki R. 0000-0002-7492-6303 [1] [6] Laugesen C.S. 0000-0003-4279-8180 [7] Moller S. 0000-0003-0858-4269 [1] Pedersen F.N. 0000-0003-3713-9949 [1] [2] Schielke K.C. 0000-0002-4281-9626 [8] Thykjaer A.S. 0000-0002-2621-4360 [1] [2] Grauslund J. 0000-0001-5019-0736 (Corresponding author) [1] [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Southern Denmark
  2. [NORA names: SDU University of Southern Denmark; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Odense University Hospital
  4. [NORA names: Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Organization of Danish Practicing Ophthalmologists
  6. [NORA names: Other Hospitals; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  7. [4] Aarhus University Hospital
  8. [NORA names: Central Denmark Region; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  9. [5] Rigshospitalet
  10. [NORA names: Capital Region of Denmark; Hospital; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate diabetic retinopathy (DR) as a potential marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adults with type 1 diabetes attending the Danish DR-screening programme and non-diabetes adults. Methods: In this registry-based matched case–cohort study, we identified 16 547 adults with type 1 diabetes, who were registered in the Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy (DiaBase). Each case was age- and sex-matched by five non-diabetes individuals (n = 82 399), and odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for incident and upcoming CVD in multivariable models. Results: Adults with type 1 diabetes (median age 44.5 years, 57.6% male) were more likely to have prevalent CVD (OR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.20–1.38) and to develop CVD within 5 years (HR 1.19; 95% CI, 1.08–1.30) as compared to non-diabetes control. However, adults without DR were less likely to develop CVD (HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72–0.97) compared to the reference population. For adults with type 1 diabetes, there was an increasing risk for incident CVD for increasing levels of DR (HR 1.33, 1.95, 1.71 and 2.39 for DR-levels 1–4, respectively). Patients with CVD at the time of the first screening had a higher risk to develop DR during follow-up (HR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02–1.49). Conclusion: In a nationwide matched case–cohort study adjusted for potential confounders, DR was identified as an independent marker of prevalent and incident CVD in type 1 diabetes with increasing risk demonstrated for higher levels of DR. Likewise, CVD also independently predicted the risk of incident DR.

Keywords

cardiovascular disease, diabetic retinopathy, registry-based, screening, type 1 diabetes

Data Provider: Elsevier