open access publication

Article, 2024

Engaging health care professionals in quality improvement: A qualitative study exploring the synergies between projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation in quality improvement collaborative implementation in Denmark

Journal of Health Services Research Policy, ISSN 1355-8196, Volume 29, 3, Pages 163-172, 10.1177/13558196241231169

Contributors

Carstensen K. 0000-0002-4999-1314 (Corresponding author) [1] Goldman J. 0000-0003-1589-4070 [2] Kjeldsen A.M. 0000-0003-0787-0351 [1] Lou S. 0000-0001-6177-5780 [1] Nielsen C.P. 0000-0001-9199-3463 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Aarhus University
  2. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] University of Toronto
  4. [NORA names: Canada; America, North; OECD]

Abstract

Objective: To examine the projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation forming health care professions’ engagement in quality improvement collaborative (QIC) implementation in Denmark, and to analyse the synergies and tensions between the two projects given the opportunities afforded by the QICs. Methods: This was a cross-sectional interview study with professionals involved in the implementation of two national QICs in Denmark involving 23 individual interviews and focus group discussions with 75 people representing different professional groups. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis of the data, drawing on institutional contributions to organisational studies of professions. Results: Study participants engaged widely in QIC implementation. This engagement was formed by a constructive interplay between the professions’ projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation, with only few tensions identified. The project of professionalisation relates to a self-oriented agenda of contributing professional expertise and promoting professional recognition and development, while the project of institutionalisation focuses on improving health care processes and outcomes and advancing quality improvement. Both projects were largely similar across professional groups. The interplay between the two projects was enabled by the bottom-up approach to implementation, participation of QI specialists, and a clear focus on developing and delivering high-quality patient care. Conclusions: Future strategies for QIC implementation should position QICs as a framework that promotes the integration of professions’ projects of professionalisation and institutionalisation to successfully engage professionals in the implementation process, and thereby optimise the effectiveness of QICs in health care.

Keywords

healthcare professions, implementation, quality improvement collaboratives

Funders

  • Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Region Midtjylland
  • DEFACTUM
  • Graduate School of Health Sciences

Data Provider: Elsevier