Article, 2024

Patient, productivity, and quality representation in healthcare non-financial disclosure

Accounting Auditing Accountability Journal, ISSN 0951-3574, 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2021-5215

Contributors

Malmmose M. 0000-0002-8507-0731 (Corresponding author) [1] [2] Linneberg M.S. 0000-0002-6205-6312 [2]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University College of Northern Denmark
  2. [NORA names: UCN University College of Northern Denmark; College; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Aarhus University
  4. [NORA names: AU Aarhus University; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to examine developments in the discursive practice of non-financial reporting in the public healthcare sector. In doing so, the authors investigate how the main reform foci of productivity and quality are represented, with a specific focus on the patient. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on critical discourse analysis (CDA), the authors conduct a longitudinal study (2007–2018) of healthcare reporting foci across the five administrative regions responsible for public hospitals in Denmark. The study analyses sixty annual reports and draws on contemporary reform documents over this period. CDA enables a micro-textual analysis, combined with macro-insights and discussions on social practice. Findings: The findings show complex webs of presentation strategies, but in particular two changes occur during the period. First, the patient is centred throughout but the framing changes from productivity and waiting lists to quality and dialogue. Second, in the first years, the regions present themselves as actively highlighting financial and quality concerns, which changes to a passive and indirect form of presentation steered by indicators and patient legislation enforced by central government. This enhances passivity and distance in healthcare regional non-financial reporting where the regions seek to conform to such demands. Simultaneously, however, the authors find a tendency to highlight very different local initiatives, which shows an attempt to go beyond a pure automatic mode of reporting found in earlier studies. Originality/value: Responding to the literature on both healthcare and financial reporting, this study identifies novel links between micro-level texts and macro-level social practices, enabling insights into the potentially intertwined impacts of public-sector reporting. The authors offer insights into the complexity of the construction of non-financial reporting in the public sector, which has a wider impact and different intentions than private-sector reporting.

Keywords

Critical discourse analysis (CDA), Hospitals, Legitimacy, Non-financial disclosure, Public-sector reporting, Quality

Data Provider: Elsevier