Article, 2024

Physical Activity and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Pregnancy: Does It Matter during Leisure or Work?

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, ISSN 0195-9131, 1530-0315, Volume 56, 1, Pages 110-117, 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003287

Contributors

Liu X. [1] Chen L. 0000-0002-8458-5661 [1] Li J. 0000-0003-2614-4291 [1] Holtermann A. 0000-0003-4825-5697 [2] Lu R. [3] Birukov A. 0000-0002-8306-3351 [4] Weir N.L. [5] Tsai M.Y. 0000-0001-7553-3408 [5] Zhang C. 0000-0002-8014-2708 (Corresponding author) [4] [6]

Affiliations

  1. [1] Department of Epidemiology
  2. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  3. [2] National Research Centre for the Working Environment
  4. [NORA names: NFA National Research Centre for the Working Environment; Governmental Institutions; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Washington University School of Medicine
  6. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  7. [4] Harvard School of Public Health
  8. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];
  9. [5] University of Minnesota Medical School
  10. [NORA names: United States; America, North; OECD];

Abstract

Introduction Physical activity (PA), regardless of domain, is recommended for pregnant individuals in clinical guidelines, but limited evidence is available for work-related PA. This study aimed to examine the associations of occupational (OPA) and leisure-time PA (LTPA) with plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a risk marker for adverse pregnancy outcomes, among pregnant individuals. Methods This longitudinal study included 257 workers in the fetal growth cohort. OPA/LTPA and hs-CRP were measured in each trimester. OPA/LTPA was divided into high and low groups by the median level. Multivariable linear regressions were applied to estimate the adjusted geometric mean differences of hs-CRP (mg·L-1) comparing high versus low OPA/LTPA in each trimester and the changes in OPA/LTPA over pregnancy. Results OPA was positively associated with hs-CRP (high: 5.14 vs low: 3.59; P value: 0.001) in the first trimester, particularly for standing/walking or walking fast, regardless of carrying things. LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP in the second (high: 3.93 vs low: 5.08; 0.02) and third trimesters (high: 3.30 vs low: 4.40; 0.046). Compared with the low OPA + high LTPA group, hs-CRP was higher in both the high OPA + high LTPA and high OPA + low LTPA groups in the first trimester, and in the high OPA + low LTPA group only in the third trimester. The change in OPA during pregnancy was positively associated with hs-CRP, whereas the change in LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP from the second to the third trimester. Conclusions In pregnant individuals, LTPA was negatively associated with hs-CRP, whereas OPA was positively associated with hs-CRP. More research on OPA's health impact among pregnant individuals is needed, and guidelines may consider the potential unfavorable influence of OPA on pregnant individuals.

Keywords

EXERCISE, HIGH-SENSITIVITY C-REACTIVE PROTEIN, LEISURE-TIME PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, MATERNAL HEALTH, OCCUPATIONAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, PREGNANCY

Funders

  • Southern California NIOSH Education and Research Center
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD

Data Provider: Elsevier