open access publication

Article, 2024

Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation

Statistics in Medicine, ISSN 0277-6715, Volume 43, 3, Pages 534-547, 10.1002/sim.9969

Contributors

Gabriel E.E. 0000-0002-0504-8404 (Corresponding author) [1] Sachs M.C. 0000-0002-1279-8676 [1] Martinussen T. 0000-0002-9760-6791 [1] Waernbaum I. 0000-0002-4457-5311 [2] Goetghebeur E. 0000-0002-8896-0721 [3] Vansteelandt S. 0000-0002-4207-8733 [3] Sjolander A. 0000-0001-5226-6685 [4]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Copenhagen
  2. [NORA names: KU University of Copenhagen; University; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  3. [2] Uppsala University
  4. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] Ghent University
  6. [NORA names: Belgium; Europe, EU; OECD];
  7. [4] Karolinska Institutet
  8. [NORA names: Sweden; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD]

Abstract

There are now many options for doubly robust estimation; however, there is a concerning trend in the applied literature to believe that the combination of a propensity score and an adjusted outcome model automatically results in a doubly robust estimator and/or to misuse more complex established doubly robust estimators. A simple alternative, canonical link generalized linear models (GLM) fit via inverse probability of treatment (propensity score) weighted maximum likelihood estimation followed by standardization (the (Formula presented.) -formula) for the average causal effect, is a doubly robust estimation method. Our aim is for the reader not just to be able to use this method, which we refer to as IPTW GLM, for doubly robust estimation, but to fully understand why it has the doubly robust property. For this reason, we define clearly, and in multiple ways, all concepts needed to understand the method and why it is doubly robust. In addition, we want to make very clear that the mere combination of propensity score weighting and an adjusted outcome model does not generally result in a doubly robust estimator. Finally, we hope to dispel the misconception that one can adjust for residual confounding remaining after propensity score weighting by adjusting in the outcome model for what remains ‘unbalanced’ even when using doubly robust estimators. We provide R code for our simulations and real open-source data examples that can be followed step-by-step to use and hopefully understand the IPTW GLM method. We also compare to a much better-known but still simple doubly robust estimator.

Keywords

causal inference, doubly robust, generalized linear models

Funders

  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden

Data Provider: Elsevier