open access publication

Article, 2023

Effects of feeding a thermomechanical, enzyme-facilitated, coprocessed yeast and soybean meal on growth performance, organ weights, leg health, and gut development of broiler chickens

Poultry Science, ISSN 0032-5791, Volume 102, 5, 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102578

Contributors

Colombino E. 0000-0002-6371-2000 [1] Karimi M. 0000-0003-3799-8380 [2] Ton Nu M.A. 0000-0002-2473-2041 [2] Tilatti A.A. [1] Bellezza Oddon S. 0000-0001-8942-0682 [1] Calini F. Bergamino C. 0000-0002-6218-6053 [1] Fiorilla E. 0000-0002-0173-1118 [1] Gariglio M. [1] Gai F. 0000-0003-1037-9483 [3] Capucchio M.T. 0000-0002-1068-0551 (Corresponding author) [1] [3] Schiavone A. 0000-0002-8011-6999 [1] Gasco L. 0000-0002-1829-7936 [1] Biasato I. 0000-0002-8855-4248 [1]

Affiliations

  1. [1] University of Turin
  2. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD];
  3. [2] AB Neo a/s
  4. [NORA names: Other Companies; Private Research; Denmark; Europe, EU; Nordic; OECD];
  5. [3] National Research Council
  6. [NORA names: Italy; Europe, EU; OECD]

Abstract

The development of a healthy gut during prestarter and starter phases is crucial to drive chicken's productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a thermomechanical, enzyme-facilitated, coprocessed yeast and soybean meal (pYSM) on growth performance, organ weights, leg health, and gut development in broiler chickens. A total of 576 as-hatched broiler chicks were randomly allotted to 3 dietary treatments (8 replicates/treatment, 24 chickens/replicate): a control group (C) without the pYSM, a treatment group 1 (T1), in which the pSYM was included at 20, 10, 5, 0, and 0% levels in the prestarter, starter, grower, finisher I, and finisher II feeding phases, respectively, and a treatment group 2 (T2), in which the pSYM was included at 5, 5, 5, 0, and 0% levels in each feeding phase. On d 3 and 10, 16 broilers/treatment were euthanized. The T1 broilers tended to show higher live weight (d 3 and 7) and average daily gain (prestarter and starter phases) than the other groups (P ≤ 0.10). Differently, pYSM-based diets did not influence the growth performance of the other feeding phases and the whole experimental period (P > 0.05). Relative weights of pancreas and liver were also unaffected by pYSM utilization (P > 0.05). Litter quality tended to have higher average scores in C group (P = 0.079), but no differences were observed for leg health (P > 0.05). Histomorphometry of gut, liver, and bursa of Fabricius was not affected by diet (P > 0.05). Gut immunity was driven to an anti-inflammatory pattern, with the reduction of IL-2, INF-γ, and TNF-α in the duodenum of treated birds (d 3, P < 0.05). Also, MUC-2 was greater in the duodenum of C and T2 group when compared to T1 (d 3, P = 0.016). Finally, T1-fed chickens displayed greater aminopeptidase activity in the duodenum (d 3 and 10, P < 0.05) and jejunum (d 3, P < 0.05). Feeding high levels of pYSM (10–20%) to broilers in the first 10 d tended to improve growth performance in the prestarter and starter phases. It also positively downregulated proinflammatory cytokines during the first 3 d, as well as stimulated the aminopeptidase activity in the prestarter and starter periods.

Keywords

broiler chicken, coprocessed yeast and soybean meal, growth performance, gut health, poultry

Data Provider: Elsevier